P-1413. Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing for Pre-XDR/XDR-TB Diagnosis: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis in South Africa, India, and Georgia
Ginenus Fekadu, Tadesse Tolossa, Tesfaye Regassa Feyissa, Sze Chai Chan, Nathorn Chaiyakunapruk, Shanquan Chen, Martin Siegel, Wai-Kit Ming
Open Forum Infectious Diseases · 2026-01
Abstract
Abstract Background Drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB), particularly pre-extensively and extensively drug-resistant TB (pre-XDR/XDR-TB), is a critical global health challenge. Phenotypic drug susceptibility testing (pDST), the gold standard, has prolonged turnaround times, while targeted next-generation sequencing (tNGS) rapidly identifies resistance-conferring mutations. This study evaluates the cost-effectiveness of tNGS-based strategies for diagnosing pre-XDR/XDR-TB among rifampicin-resistant TB (RR-TB) patients in South Africa, India, and Georgia. Methods A decision-analytic model—combining a short-term decision tree and a 10-year Markov component —simulated outcomes for RR-TB cohorts under three strategies: (a) pDST, (b) tNGS, and (c) a combination of pDST and tNGS. Outcomes included direct medical costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), early treatment rates, mortality, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). Inputs were derived from public databases and published literature. Cost-effectiveness was evaluated against country-specific GDP-based willingness-to-pay (WTP) thresholds, with sensitivity analyses assessing the uncertainty. Results tNGS-based strategies improved early treatment initiation and reduced mortality across all settings. In South Africa, tNGS was cost-effective (ICER: $2,805/QALY; WTP: $6,253/QALY). In India, neither tNGS ($4,453/QALY) nor the combination ($6,198/QALY) met cost-effectiveness (WTP: $2,485/QALY). In Georgia, the combination strategy was preferred (ICER: $6,361/QALY; WTP: $8,120/QALY). Key cost-effectiveness drivers included the hazard ratio for mortality from delayed treatment and tNGS costs. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis (10,000 Monte Carlo simulations) showed tNGS had 58% cost-effectiveness probability in South Africa, whereas pDST (50%) and combination strategies (42%) were preferred in India and Georgia, respectively. Conclusion tNGS is cost-effective for pre-XDR/XDR-TB diagnosis in South Africa and Georgia but not in India under current economic conditions. The findings underscore context-specific benefits, including earlier treatment and reduced mortality. Policymakers should balance upfront costs with long-term gains, prioritizing local healthcare needs. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures
MeSH terms
- Medicine
- Tuberculosis
- Gold standard (test)
- Public health
- Hazard ratio
- Probabilistic logic
- Decision tree
- Intensive care medicine
- Multi-drug-resistant tuberculosis
- Demography