Infectious sacroiliitis: insights from long-term follow-up and the diagnostic contribution of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging.
Wiem Feki, Amal Chakroun, Amina Kammoun, Fatma Hammami, Khaoula Rekik, Zeineb Mnif, Makram Koubaa, Mounir Ben Jemaa
European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025-10
Abstract
PURPOSE: Infectious sacroiliitis (ISI) is a rare condition with non-specific symptoms, often leading to delayed diagnosis We aim to describe the clinical, microbiological, and radiological characteristics of infectious sacroiliitis (ISI), and to highlight the diagnostic and follow-up value of imaging modalities.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of 35 ISI cases diagnosed over 27 years. Clinical, microbiological, and imaging data were collected. CT and MRI findings were compared, and follow-up imaging was analyzed when available.
RESULTS: The mean age was 40.9 years, with a female predominance (60%). Pyogenic organisms were identified in 45.7% of cases, Mycobacterium tuberculosis in 34.3%, and Brucella spp. in 20%. The average diagnostic delay was 102 days. The most frequent symptoms were fever (80%) and buttock pain (77.1%), and inflammatory markers were elevated in approximately 90% of cases. Blood cultures were positive in 6.4%, while biopsy and abscess aspiration confirmed the etiological diagnosis in 28.6% and 14.3%, respectively. Imaging played a central role: CT revealed bony erosions (84.6%) and periarticular involvement (69.2%), while MRI, performed in 13 cases, showed signal abnormalities (85.7%), contrast enhancement (91.7%), and detected soft tissue abscesses (30.8%) and extension to adjacent bone or soft tissues (38.5%). Among the 10 patients who underwent both CT and MRI, MRI detected joint space widening more frequently than CT (70% vs. 50%, p = 0.038) and revealed periarticular infiltration in all cases compared to 60% on CT (p = 0.045). Conversely, CT identified bone sequestra in 50% of patients, whereas none were visualized on MRI (p = 0.041). Radiological follow-up showed improvement in 83.3% of cases, although residual lesions persisted.
CONCLUSION: ISI is difficult to diagnose due to its non-specific presentation. Imaging is essential for early diagnosis, guiding treatment, and monitoring response.
MeSH terms
- Humans
- Female
- Adult
- Male
- Sacroiliitis
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- Tomography, X-Ray Computed
- Retrospective Studies
- Middle Aged
- Follow-Up Studies
- Young Adult
- Aged
- Adolescent
- Arthritis, Infectious