Stool-Based Molecular Tuberculosis Treatment Monitoring: A Faster Means for Detecting Persistent Mycobacteria Compared to Phenotypic Culture

Background Tuberculosis (TB) treatment monitoring is hindered by the lack of a rapidly measured biomarker that accurately predicts clinically relevant outcomes. Symptom screening poorly correlates with bacillary burden. Although culture is a direct measure of viable bacillary burden, the long turnaround time makes it clinically irrelevant. Methods The TB treatment monitoring potential of stool-based, quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) was prospectively assessed among 231 participants of all ages from Eswatini, Tanzania, and Mozambique with microbiologically confirmed TB. Stool qPCR results were compared to sputum culture, persistent symptoms, drug resistance, and World Health Organization TB outcomes. Results Quantitative bacillary burden measured by stool qPCR strongly correlated with sputum culture at baseline (Spearman correlation r s = 0.79; P 90% of all timepoints, while sputum collection decreased to P = .004), and a smaller absolute difference between the qPCR cycle threshold measured at 2 weeks and baseline (OR, 0.72; P = .0006). Neither sputum culture, sputum Xpert Ultra, or stool qPCR was associated with resolution of symptoms or in-treatment death. Conclusions Stool-based TB treatment monitoring correlates with sputum culture but provides results faster, leverages a more accessible specimen, and identifies patients with TB who are at risk for drug resistance and persistent 2-month culture positivity. None of the quantitative tests of bacillary burden singularly could predict symptom resolution or death.