Assays for Assessing Mycobacterium avium Immunity and Evaluating the Effects of Therapeutics
Getahun Abate, Krystal A. Meza, Chase G. Colbert, Christopher S. Eickhoff
Pathogens · 2024-10
Abstract
complex (MAC). Sadly, the treatment of pulmonary MAC is suboptimal with failure rates ranging from 37% to 58%. Therefore, there is a need to develop new therapeutics. Developing new immunotherapies and studying their interaction with standard or new drugs requires reliable assays. Four different assays including CFSE-based flow cytometry, in vitro protection assays, IFN-γ ELISPOT, and murine infection models were optimized using a reference strain of MAC (ATCC 700898) to help with the development of immunotherapies for MAC. Expansion of proliferating and IFN-γ producing human T cells is optimal after 7 days of stimulation with MAC at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 0.1, achieving a stimulation index of 26.5 ± 11.6 (mean ± SE). The in vitro protection assay for MAC works best by co-culturing T cells expanded for 7 days with MAC (MOI 1)-infected autologous macrophages. Aerosol MAC infection of mice allows measurement of the effects of the BCG vaccine and clarithromycin. IFN-γ ELISPOT assays with live MAC (MOI 3) stimulation of splenocytes from mice immunized with BCG help identify differences between unimmunized mice and mice immunized with BCG. In conclusion, multiple assays are available for use to identify MAC-specific effector T cells, which will help in the development of new therapeutics or vaccines against pulmonary MAC.
MeSH terms
- ELISPOT
- Flow cytometry
- Immunology
- Mycobacterium avium complex
- Immunity
- Medicine
- Nontuberculous mycobacteria
- In vitro
- Biology
- Mycobacterium
- Microbiology