Relative Contribution of Diagnostic Testing to the Diagnosis of Respiratory Syncytial Virus in Hospitalized Adults in the United States
Evan J. Anderson, Ashley Tippett, Elizabeth Begier, Theda Gibson, Gabby Ess, Vikash Patel, Meg Taylor, Olivia Reese, et al. (32 authors)
The Journal of Infectious Diseases · 2024-07
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a leading cause of acute respiratory illness (ARI) in older adults. Optimizing diagnosis could improve understanding of RSV burden. METHODS: We enrolled adults ≥50 years of age hospitalized with ARI and adults of any age hospitalized with congestive heart failure or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations at 2 hospitals during 2 respiratory seasons (2018-2020). We collected nasopharyngeal (NP) and oropharyngeal (OP) swabs (n = 1558), acute and convalescent sera (n = 568), and expectorated sputum (n = 153) from participants, and recorded standard-of-care (SOC) NP results (n = 805). We measured RSV antibodies by 2 immunoassays and performed BioFire testing on respiratory specimens. RESULTS: Of 1558 eligible participants, 92 (5.9%) tested positive for RSV by any diagnostic method. Combined NP/OP polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing yielded 58 positives, while separate NP and OP testing identified 11 additional positives (18.9% increase). Compared to study NP/OP PCR alone, the addition of paired serology increased RSV detection by 42.9% (28 vs 40) among those with both specimen types, while the addition of SOC swab PCR increased RSV detection by 25.9% (47 vs 59). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of paired serology testing, SOC swab results, and separate testing of NP and OP swabs improved RSV diagnostic yield in hospitalized adults.
MeSH terms
- Medicine
- Serology
- Sputum
- Respiratory system
- Internal medicine
- False positive paradox
- Antibody