The bronchiectasis exacerbation definition in a real-world setting: data from the EMBARC registry
Mattia Nigro, Megan Crichton, Pieter Goeminne, Natalie Lorent, Katerina Dimakou, Oriol Sibila, Rosario Menéndez, Michal Shteinberg, et al. (13 authors)
Abstract
In 2017 EMBARC and BRR published a consensus definition of bronchiectasis exacerbation (BEX) for use in clinical studies. Validation in a real-world setting is needed. The EMBARC exacerbation sub-study is a nested observational cohort within the larger EMBARC registry, enrolling patients during an exacerbation defined by clinicians’ judgement. Patients were classified using BEX symptoms into two study groups: those consistent (A) or not consistent (B) with the EMBARC/BRR definition. 321 (62.6% female, median age 64) patients were enrolled from 15 different countries: 81% met the EMBARC/BRR definition (Group A). The most common symptoms of BEX in Group A were cough (96.2%), increased sputum volume (86.5%) and purulence (81.9%), while those in Group B had cough (42.6%), increased dyspnoea (34.4%) and fatigue (34.4%). Patients in Group A were significantly more severe than Group B in terms of BSI, FEV1 and daily sputum volume during stable state. A significantly different prevalence of BEX patients fulfilling the EMBARC/BRR definition was found when the population was stratified according to comorbid COPD and asthma (table). <b>Conclusion:</b> Up to one fifth of BEX treated by clinicians in real-life cannot be detected using the EMBARC/BRR definition. The presence of asthma as a comorbidity is associated with different exacerbation symptoms. <b>Acknowledgments:</b> EMBARC has received support from the EU/EFPIA Innovative Medicines Initiative Joint Undertaking iABC grant agreement no 115721
MeSH terms
- Exacerbation
- Medicine
- Bronchiectasis
- COPD
- Sputum
- Group B
- Asthma
- Comorbidity
- Internal medicine
- Population
- Cohort
- Pediatrics
- Physical therapy