TB Research

The Inappropriateness of Using Rifampicin E-Test to Predict Rifabutin Resistance in <i>Helicobacter pylori</i>

Tiankuo Yang, Bowen Liu, Jun-peng Zhou, Yalin Shen, Xiaona Song, Xiaoqiong Tang, Mohammed Benghezal, Barry J. Marshall, et al. (10 authors)

The Journal of Infectious Diseases · 2022-12

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the rifamycin cross-resistance in Helicobacter pylori, and whether the use of rifampicin E-test strips to screen H. pylori rifabutin resistance is appropriate. METHODS: A total of 89 H. pylori isolates were included. Rifampicin minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were obtained by E-test, while the MICs for rifapentine, rifaximin, and rifabutin were determined by agar dilution method. The rifamycin resistance rates based on different breakpoints were compared. Isolates with high-level rifampicin resistance were subjected to whole-genome sequencing. RESULTS: A wide distribution of MICs (mostly in the range 0.125-8 mg/L) was observed for rifampicin, rifapentine, and rifaximin. Using MIC >1, ≥ 4, and > 4 mg/L as the breakpoints, resistance rates to rifampicin/rifapentine/rifaximin were 60.4%/48.3%/38.2%, 28.1%/25.8%/23.6%, and 15.7%/16.9%/7.9%, respectively. However, the rifabutin MICs of all the tested H. pylori isolates were extremely low (≤0.016 mg/L). Applying MIC ≥ 0.125 mg/L as the breakpoint, rifabutin resistance was nil. No mutation was found in the rpoB gene sequences of the 2 isolates with high-level rifampicin resistance. CONCLUSIONS: There is a lack of cross-resistance between rifabutin and other rifamycins in H. pylori. The use of rifampicin E-test to predict H. pylori rifabutin resistance is inappropriate.

MeSH terms

  • Rifabutin
  • Rifampicin
  • Microbiology
  • Rifamycin
  • Helicobacter pylori
  • Antibacterial agent
  • Agar dilution
  • Rifapentine
  • Biology
  • Minimum inhibitory concentration
  • Medicine
  • Antibiotics