Xpert Ultra in diagnosing extrapulmonary TB: accuracy and trace calls
Marilyn Mary Ninan, Priscilla Rupali, George M. Varghese, E. Shalini, K. Venkatesh, Mark Ranjan Jesudason, G. Rebekah, J. S. Michael
The International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease · 2022-05
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Xpert Ultra (Ultra) was developed to improve the detection of TB; however, data on Ultra´s diagnostic accuracy in extrapulmonary TB (EPTB) are limited. METHODS: In this prospective diagnostic accuracy study, 242 EPTB samples were subjected to Ultra and Xpert MTB/Rif (Xpert) testing, and these were compared with both culture and a composite gold standard. RESULTS: Compared to culture, Ultra sensitivity and specificity using bone, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), lymph node and tissue samples, and overall were respectively 100% and 77.3%, 75% and 100%, 87.5% and 87.5%, 100% and 87%, and 89.7% and 87.4%; in comparison to the composite gold standard, Ultra´s sensitivity and specificity were respectively 66.7% and 100%, 17.6% and 100%, 46.9% and 95.7%, 38.5% and 94.1%, and 46.2% and 96.9%. Using latent class analysis, sensitivity and specificity were respectively 94.5% and 96.3% for Ultra, 65.5% and 99.8% for Xpert, and 58.6% and 99.2% for culture. There were 22/242 (9%) trace calls on Ultra. CONCLUSION: We found improved sensitivity for Ultra compared to Xpert, although Ultra specificity was lower, with a large number of trace results (9%).
MeSH terms
- Medicine
- Gold standard (test)
- Extrapulmonary tuberculosis
- Diagnostic accuracy
- Internal medicine
- Prospective cohort study