A158 COMPARING CORTIMENT® AND PREDNISONE IN ULCERTATIVE COLITIS: A POPULATION-BASED STUDY OF OUTCOMES

Abstract Background In August 2016 Cortiment® was approved for use in ulcerative colitis (UC) patients in Canada, but not approved for reimbursement; the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technology in Health cited no comparable benefit for its use over other approved UC medications. Real-world data comparing Cortiment® to other UC medications is limited, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic where the use of steroids is counter-indicated for COVID-19-related outcomes. Aims To examine the comparative risk of hospitalization, surgery, and infection after initiation of Cortiment® or oral corticosteroids among UC patients using real-world data Methods Using population-based data from Alberta Canada, two cohorts were compared: 1. Patients dispensed Cortiment® and an ICD diagnostic code for UC [9: 556.X; 10: K51.X] (August 1, 2016 to October 31, 2019); and, 2. Validated (algorithm) UC patients dispensed a >30 day supply or >500mg in 24 hours of prednisone/prednisolone (April 1, 2016 to October 31, 2019). All hospitalizations, IBD-surgery, or infections (i.e., pneumonia, c.diff, sepsis, tuberculosis) that occurred 6 or 12 months from initial medication dispensing were identified. Cox-proportional hazard models, with Hazard Ratios (HR), assessed comparative outcomes. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were created, and Poisson regression (or negative binomial) used to assess the Average Monthly Percentage Change (AMPC) with associated 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results We identified 917 Cortiment® and 2,404 Prednisone patients. Over the study period, prednisone dispensing significantly decreased (AMPC:-2.53% [CI:-2.85,-2.21]) while Cortiment® remained stable. Dispensing of Cortiment® significantly decreased the hazard of hospitalization (all types, except surgery) at 12 months as compared to prednisone, and significantly decreased the hazard of an infection at both 6 and 12 months (Table 1, Fig 1). Conclusions The use of Cortiment® in a real-world setting is associated with fewer deleterious outcomes, and its use during a pandemic should be preferred, especially when it’s counterpart can exacerbate negative COVID-19-related outcomes. Table 1Cortiment (%)Prednisone (%)N9172,404AgeMedian (Q1; Q3)45.9 (33.3, 58.5)43.9 (31.8, 59.1)SexMale430 (46.9)1,356 (56.4)Female487 (53.1)1,048 (43.6)Cortiment; n(%)Prednisone; n (%)HR (95%CI)All Hosp6-months107 (11.67)409 (17.0)0.83 (0.63, 1.11)1-year152 (16.58)592 (24.6)0.64 (0.54, 0.77)IBD-Related6-months72 (7.85)279 (11.6)0.67 (0.52, 0.87)1-year102 (11.12)394 (16.4)0.66 (0.53, 0.82)IBD-Specific6-months58 (6.32)223 (9.28)0.91 (0.63, 1.32)1-year79 (8.62)312 (12.98)0.66 (0.51, 0.84)IBD-Surgery6-months13 (1.42)57 (2.37)0.61 (0.33, 1.11)1-year24 (2.62)101 (4.20)1.05 (0.61, 1.82)Infection6-months25 (2.73)152 (6.32)0.43 (0.28, 0.65)1-year41 (4.47)213 (8.86)0.49 (0.35, 0.69) Kaplan-Meier Survival Curves of 1-year Outcomes: A) All Hospitalizations; B) IBD-Related Hospitalizations; C) IBD-Specific Hospitalizations; and, D) Any Infection. Dashed Line Cortiment Cohort Solid Line Prednisone/Prednisolone Cohort Funding Agencies Ferring Pharmaceuticals