Diagnostic yield and safety of the ProCore versus the standard EBUS-TBNA needle in subjects with suspected sarcoidosis
Dhooria S, Sehgal IS, Prasad KT, Muthu V, Gupta N, Bal A, Ram B, Aggarwal AN, et al. (9 authors)
Expert review of medical devices · 2021-01
Abstract
Background : No randomized trial has compared the yield of the ProCore needle, a novel needle for endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS)-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA), with standard needles. Research design and methods : Consecutive subjects with intrathoracic lymphadenopathy due to suspected sarcoidosis were randomized 1:1 to undergo EBUS-TBNA with either the 22-gauge ProCore (EchoTip-ProCore, Cook-Medical) or the 22-gauge standard (Vizishot, Olympus) needle. The primary outcome was the diagnostic sensitivity; the secondary outcomes included the number of adequate aspirates obtained and procedure-related complications. Results : We randomized 100 (mean age, 43.4 years; 53% women) subjects. Of the 84 subjects finally diagnosed with sarcoidosis, the sensitivity of EBUS-TBNA was higher with the ProCore (36/42, 85.7%) versus the standard needle (31/42, 73.8%), although not statistically significant (p = 0.18). We obtained adequate aspirates in 95.2% and 90.5% subjects in the ProCore and the standard needle groups, respectively (p = 0.68). One complication (transient hypoxemia) occurred in each group. There were two incidences of the ProCore needle getting bent during the procedure. Conclusions : We found no difference in the sensitivity, specimen adequacy, or safety of EBUS-TBNA when performed with the ProCore or the Olympus needle in subjects with sarcoidosis. Larger studies are required to confirm our findings.[clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03656003].
MeSH terms
- Humans
- Sarcoidosis
- Bronchoscopy
- Endpoint Determination
- Retrospective Studies
- Needles
- Reference Standards
- Adult
- Female
- Male
- Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration