TB Research

Impact and operational feasibility of TrueNat <sup>™</sup> MTB/Rif under India’s RNTCP

Kathiresan Jeyashree, Devika Shanmugasundaram, Kiran Rade, Raman Gangakhedkar, Manoj Murhekar

Public Health Action · 2020-09

Abstract

BACKGROUND: (MTB) and rifampicin (RIF) resistance at 193 TB units (TUs) in October 2018. We evaluated its impact on TB diagnosis and assessed the operational feasibility of its deployment at point-of-care (POC) settings. METHODS: We compared the number of presumptive TB cases tested and the number (proportion) of microbiologically positive before (January-August 2018) and after (January-August 2019) the deployment of TrueNat. We interviewed laboratory technicians and Senior TB Laboratory Supervisor from 25 randomly selected TUs to assess operational feasibility. RESULTS: In 2018, 10.5% (range 8.9-13.1) of 245,989 presumptive cases tested were positive. In 2019, of the 185,435 presumptive cases tested, 13.7% (range 9.6-18.9) were positive. The proportion of presumptive TB cases in whom MTB was detected using TrueNat was 14.4% (range 10.0-21.2). TrueNat significantly increased case detection (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 1.30; 95%CI 1.15-1.46), yielding an additional 18 TB cases per 100 000 population. Laboratory technicians became comfortable in performing TrueNat after a median of 10 tests (interquartile range 5-17.5). Invalid reports declined from 6.8% to 3.6%. CONCLUSION: The deployment of TrueNat as POC diagnostic test improved case detection and was operationally feasible under RNTCP.

MeSH terms

  • Medicine
  • Interquartile range
  • Tuberculosis
  • Population
  • Tuberculosis control
  • Case finding
  • Mycobacterium tuberculosis
  • Incidence (geometry)