TB Research

Diagnostic accuracy of the Xpert MTB/RIF assay for abdominal tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Vishal Sharma, Hariom Soni, Praveen Kumar, Saurabh Dawra, Shubhra Mishra, Harshal Mandavdhare, Harjeet Singh, Usha Dutta

Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy · 2020-08

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We performed a meta-analysis to determine diagnostic accuracy of Xpert MTB/RIF for diagnosis of abdominal (intestinal or peritoneal) tuberculosis (TB) in various tissues (intestinal, omental/peritoneal tissue or ascitic fluid). METHODS: Electronic databases were searched for observational studies on use of Xpert MTB/RIF in ascitic fluid, peritoneal, or omental tissue for diagnosis of peritoneal and intestinal TB. We calculated the pooled sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic odds ratio of Xpert MTB/RIF for diagnosis of peritoneal TB in comparison to composite reference standard (CRS) and culture, and in comparison to CRS for intestinal TB. RESULTS: Twenty-five observational studies were included. The pooled sensitivity and specificity as assessed with peritoneal culture from ascites as an Index test was 64% (95% Confidence Interval [C.I.] 49-76%) and 97% (95% C.I., 95-99%) respectively and with peritoneal CRS was 30% (95% C.I., 22-40%) and 100% (95% C.I., 98-100%) respectively. In the intestinal group, the pooled sensitivity and specificity of Xpert MTB/RIF was 23% (95% C.I., 16-32%) and 100% (95% C.I., 52-100%). The AUC of peritoneal culture and intestinal tissue was 0.935 and 0.499. CONCLUSION: Xpert MTB/RIF has modest sensitivity for diagnosis of peritoneal and intestinal tuberculosis but has a good specificity. PROSPERO REGISTRATION: CRD42020140545.

MeSH terms

  • Medicine
  • Internal medicine
  • Ascites
  • Gastroenterology
  • INTESTINAL TUBERCULOSIS
  • Tuberculosis
  • Peritoneal fluid
  • Meta-analysis
  • Confidence interval
  • Diagnostic odds ratio
  • Odds ratio
  • Ascitic fluid
  • Observational study
  • Pathology