Renal Transplant and Its Outcomes: Single-Center Experience From India

Objectives Improvements in early graft survival and long-term graft function have made kidney transplant a more cost-effective alternative to dialysis. We aimed to assess renal transplant outcomes over a 9-month follow-up of recipients in a cost-limited setting (a tertiary care center in India). Materials and methods Included patients in this prospective observational study were those who underwent renal transplant from July 2016 to February 2017 (8 months) and followed for 9 months. Results Of 122 included patients, 20 (16.4%) were women and 102 (83.6%) were men (mean age 35.61 ± 10.64 y), with 92 (75.4%) from a lower socioeconomic status. Kidneys were from first-degree relatives for 52 patients (42.6%), from spousal donors for 34 (27.9%), from deceased donors for 24 (19.7%), and from second/third degree relative donors for 12 (9.8%). All patients underwent only complementdependent cytotoxicity crossmatch due to financial constraints. Fifty patients (41%) had history of packed red blood cell transfusion. Induction was thymoglobulin in 60 patients (49.2%), basiliximab in 8 (6.6%), and no induction in 54 (44.3%). Forty patients (30.1%) underwent biopsy for graft dysfunction, and 32 (26.2%) had graft rejection: 18 (14.8%) with antibodymediated rejection, 5 (4.1%) with T-cell-mediated rejection, and 9 (7.4%) with both. Opportunistic infections were shown in 24.5% of patients, including primarily cytomegalovirus (10.7%), tuberculosis (5.7%), and aspergillosis (3.3%). Twenty-nine patients (24%) had new-onset diabetes posttransplant. At end of follow-up, 93 patients (76.2%) had normal graft function, 21 (17.2%) had chronic graft dysfunction, 3 (2.4%) had graft loss, and 5 (4.1%) died. History of blood transfusion (P = .001) predicted the occurrence of antibody-mediated rejection, and induction used showed trend toward prediction (P = .083). Conclusions With high rejection rates, it would be prudent to include proper immunologic testing, even in cost-limited settings, pretransplant. The high infection and death rates are also concerning.